The Brisbane Portrait Prize, renowned for its prestigious $50,000 top prize and compared to Queensland's esteemed Archibalds, has stirred up controversy by permitting entrants to submit artwork created using artificial intelligence (AI). This decision has ignited a discourse on the evolving nature of art and its intersection with technological advancements, as well as its implications for the art community.
In a departure from traditional norms, the Brisbane Portrait Prize announced in its terms and conditions that entries completed "in whole or in part by generative artificial intelligence" would be accepted, provided the artwork remains original and is solely owned by the entrant.
A spokesperson for the prize defended this stance, emphasizing the dynamic nature of art and its ability to reflect societal change. They stated, "BPP prides itself on being a contemporary prize... fostering both the ongoing evolution of art and engaging in the surrounding conversation."
While the inclusion of AI-generated entries marks a significant departure from convention, it aligns with the prize's commitment to staying abreast of contemporary artistic practices. The spokesperson highlighted the broader acceptance of digital and photographic entries in the art world, noting the role of technology in fostering inclusivity, particularly for artists with disabilities.
The decision to allow AI-generated entries has sparked debate within the art community. Some, like painter Stephen Tiernan, argue that artistic processes are still involved in creating AI-generated works, underscoring the prize's commitment to contemporaneity.
However, questions regarding ownership and authorship arise in the context of AI-assisted artwork. Dr. Rita Matulionyte, a senior lecturer in law, noted the ambiguity surrounding the level of human input required for an individual to claim ownership of an AI-generated piece under Australian copyright law.
The spokesperson for the Brisbane Portrait Prize emphasized that the competition would assess ownership based on the level of independent intellectual effort contributed by the artist. They acknowledged the evolving nature of AI technology and its implications for existing legal frameworks.
While the Brisbane Portrait Prize embraces AI-generated art, other competitions have adopted varying stances on the issue. The National Photographic Portrait Prize allows the use of generative AI tools but prohibits wholly AI-generated images, imposing strict conditions on their entry.
The debate surrounding AI-generated art extends beyond competitions to broader discussions on authenticity and trustworthiness in the art world. The World Press Photography competition recently announced the exclusion of AI-generated entries, citing the preservation of accuracy and trustworthiness as primary concerns.
As the art community grapples with the implications of AI on artistic expression and authenticity, the inclusion of AI-generated entries in prestigious competitions like the Brisbane Portrait Prize signals a pivotal moment in the evolving landscape of contemporary art.
