The decision to allow artworks created in whole or in part by generative artificial intelligence (AI) in this year's Brisbane Portrait Prize (BPP) has sparked controversy and debate among artists, photographers, and industry experts.
Art dealer Philip Bacon voiced concerns, describing the move as a "slippery slope" and questioning whether the artist or the computer should be credited for the artwork. He emphasized the importance of capturing the essence and soul of a subject in portraits, expressing skepticism about AI's ability to achieve this level of depth and connection.
In contrast, Queensland painter Stephen Tiernan took a more open-minded stance, acknowledging the subjective nature of art and the potential for AI-generated works to be judged based on individual preferences. Tiernan highlighted the artistic process involved in creating works with computer-generated tools and noted the evolution of art forms over time, including the acceptance of photography in art competitions.
Photographer Glenn Hunt criticized the decision, questioning the purpose of a competition where human artists compete against computer-generated artworks. He raised ethical concerns about the use of AI in art, particularly regarding the source of data used in AI-generated images.
The Australian Photographic Society (APS) expressed mixed views on the issue, with president Gregory McMillan emphasizing the need for transparency and clear rules when it comes to AI-generated artworks in competitions. McMillan highlighted the challenge of defining photography in the context of AI-generated images and called for clarity on authorship and creation methods.
Organizers of the BPP defended their decision, stating that the inclusion of AI artworks is not intended to replace traditional art forms but to acknowledge the evolving definition of art in society. They emphasized the importance of transparency, requiring entrants to provide information about the AI tools and methodologies used in creating their artworks.
Despite the controversy, the debate over the inclusion of AI-generated artworks in art competitions reflects broader discussions about the intersection of technology and creativity, as well as evolving perceptions of art in the digital age.
